The Structure of Home Fire
I think the reason why Shamsie structured the novel by separating it into four different perspectives is for the reader to understand each person’s thoughts, feelings, and memories. For readers to better understand what is happening in the book, it is almost essential to know what is happening in each of the four characters’ lives from their own perspectives. For example, Parvaiz’s perspective allowed readers to better understand how a Muslim can be manipulated into a person within a terrorist group. If we learned of this experience through Eamonn’s perspective, then we would have seen a more negative view of the experience in the novel, such as how Eamonn saw the homeless man on the street. If we learned of it through Aneeka’s perspective, her familial love for Parvaiz would also feed us ideas that could cause a certain bias towards what the readers see such as how she described Parvaiz to Eamonn when asking him to ask his dad to get Parvaiz back in the UK. By switching the perspectives in the book, we were able to see why Parviaz went to Syria and why he came back without any bias whatsoever. I think the reason why Shamsie put them in the order she did is because she wants to keep the reader hooked. The way Shamsie wrote each part of the novel made it so that we would get some small sentence or phrase that would hint toward something that would be explained in the future. This structure would only work if, for instance, Isma’s perspective came before Eamonn’s so that readers would know Isma’s opinions and thoughts on Aneeka before Eamonn eventually met her and we learned all about Aneeka. Also, Aneeka’s small opinions on Parvaiz through Eamonn’s perspective before we learned the whole story of Parvaiz through Parvaiz’s perspective.
Hey Paulos! I agree with you that part of perspective's role in Home Fire is to hook the reader. I think another example other than the one you listed where this happens is with Parvaiz. Isma's perspective and thoughts about him are very brief and mysterious. She doesn't ever mention what happens to him- it is only hinted at. Eamonn's perspective brings the truth to light, which is meant to be somewhat surprising. Perspective is a very useful tool that can be used to limit the information the reader receives, and this book is proof!
ReplyDeleteHi Paulos! I was thinking the same thing about how the perspectives show more "unbiased" or at least differently biased viewpoints. I think reading a book in this way definitely opened me up more to how there is always another side to a story. I was struggling a little bit with why they were ordered as they were, but what you said makes a lot of sense! Thanks for the insight!
ReplyDeleteHi Paulos! I totally agree that she put them in this order just to keep readers engaged. Each part reveals something new about the next that makes us want to keep reading. I also agree about how different stories must be told through the lens of specific people to get an accurate depiction of what happened.
ReplyDeleteHey Paulos! I totally agree that giving each character their own chapter allowed for there to be no bias. We heard both sides of the story in all of the conflicts brought up in Home Fire. I also agree that Shamsie put the characters' chapters in the order they were because of suspense.
ReplyDelete